ROBERT CURRY, JR., AND FRANCES MCCANTS CURRY, APPELLANTS,

v.

CARVER HOMES, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• In re Est. OF Lillian P. Koll, 445 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …] the trial court is required to evaluate the testimony in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and every reasonable intendment deducible from the evidence must be indulged in the plaintiffs favor,” McDaniel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 327 So. 2d 893, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), we find that the directed verdict cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial consistent with the principles set forth in Holden v. Estate of Gardner, 420 So. 2…
• The Church OF Scientology OF Cal. v. Lionel Blackman, M.D., 446 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …. Shape acted as an agent of CPPR but, as detailed hereafter, there is no evidence to link CPPR to the California Church. Viewing the testimony, as we must, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, McDaniel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 327 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), we find that Dr. Blackman established the following: (1) CPPR's incorporators are members of the Scientologist faith and attend the Tampa Mission in Tampa, Florida. (The record fails to disclose whether the Tampa Mission is affil…
• Wolmer v. Chrysler Corp., 474 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …the trial court is required to evaluate the testimony in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and every reasonable intendment deducible from the evidence must be indulged in the plaintiff’s favor.” McDaniel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 327 So. 2d 893, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); see [*836] also Hartnett v. Fowler, 94 So. 2d 724 (Fla.1957); Toyota Motor Co. v. Moll, 438 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Tesker & Tesher, P.A. v. Rothfield, 387 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). “Directed verdicts should be…