KATHLEEN LOCHRIE, A WIDOW, AND ROBERT B. LOCHRIE AND MARGARET M. LOCHRIE, HIS WIFE, PETITIONERS,

v.

MINNIE DICKEY AND WALTER C. DICKEY, HER HUSBAND, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Kessler v. Medow, 374 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Forbes v. Babel, 70 So. 2d 371 (Fla.1953); Benedict v. Dade County Realty Co., 274 So. 2d 553 (Fla.3d DCA 1973).…
• DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC, 112 So. 3d 85 (Fla. 2013)
  …[*90] (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)). The trial court further stated: “Moreover, the seller cannot take advantage of a delay in the buyer’s performance which the seller approved, even where time is of the essence under the contract.” (Citing Forbes v. Babel, 70 So. 2d 371, 372 (Fla.1953)). Second, the trial court held that King’s failure to attend the town council meeting on October 26 constituted a breach of DK Arena’s obligations under the contract. The court stated that if King intended to not attend the meeting…
• Seymour Blaustein and Miriam Blaustein v. Weiss, 409 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
  …t he was waiting for the lender to set a date for closing. Moreover, the record is void of any communication from appel-lees’ attorney in August and September designed to effect a closing or to demand a closing by a certain date. In Forbes v. Babel, 70 So. 2d 371, 372 (Fla.1953), the court said: The law is well settled that the vendor cannot take advantage of a delay in performance which he condoned or was a party to. This is true when time is the essence of the contract. The evidence shows that there was n…