EDUARDO AND HILDA PEREZ, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
LEROY'S CRANE SERVICE, AND INTERVENORS E & G CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., AND MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEES
EDUARDO AND HILDA PEREZ, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
LEROY'S CRANE SERVICE, AND INTERVENORS E & G CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., AND MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEES
328 So. 2d 49
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Grice, Fla. App.1965, 172 So. 2d 834; Luby Chevrolet, Inc. v. Foster, Fla.App.1965, 177 So. 2d 510. Also see Reyes v. Banks, Fla.App.1974, 292 So. 2d 39, 42-43.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 516 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…e babysitter was in kitchen preparing lunch; “activity referred to is not preparing lunch, which would ordinarily be incident to a non-business pursuit, but rather to the failure to properly supervise a young child.”); Peterson v. Highland Ins. Co., 328 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (policy containing business exclusion clause did not cover injury to infant who was left with homeowner running babysitting service for compensation); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kelsey, 67 Or.App. 349, 678 P. 2d 748 (in banc) (homeowner…
-
O'Conner v. Safeco INS. Co. OF N. Am., 352 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)…ial gain. See Annot. 48 A.L.R.3d 1096, 1101 '(1973). Maintenance of the road was too closely related to the business pursuit to be characterized as equivalent to one “ordinarily incident to non-business pursuits.” See Peterson v. Highlands Ins. Co., 328 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Davis v. Frederick’s, Inc., 30 Utah 2d 321, 517 P. 2d 1014 (1973); Martinelli v. Security Ins. Co. of New Haven, 490 S.W. 2d 427 (Mo.App.1972); Burroughs v. Employers Liab. Assur. Corp., 198 So. 2d 202 (La.App.1967). We have con…
-
Gaynor v. Williams, 366 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…d comprehensive . . . activity for financial gain . . .,” and thus fell within the accepted definition of a “business pursuit.”2 O’Conner v. Safeco Ins. Co. of North America, 352 So. 2d 1244, 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Peterson v. Highlands Ins. Co., 328 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Otero v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 314 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 328 So. 2d 843 (Fla.1976). Furthermore, it does not matter that the ownership of the apartment house was not [*1244] Gaynor’s only or main oc…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Florentine Reyes v. Leonard L. Banks, 292 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
- Sec. Mut. Cas. Co. v. Grice, 172 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Luby Chevrolet, Inc. v. Oris V. Foster, 177 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)