FRANKLIN HODGES WARNER AND HURE LEE TROUPE, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRANKLIN HODGES WARNER AND HURE LEE TROUPE, APPELLANTS,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
328 So. 2d 489
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Pickles v. State, Fla. 1975, 313 So. 2d 715; Vickers v. State, Fla.App.1974, 303 So. 2d 700; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1975, 305 So. 2d 868.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. Cade, 349 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)…he business in order that same may be regulated pursuant to the beverage laws of Florida. A covenant to reassign a beverage license is valid, may be specifically enforced, and is not contrary to the public policy of this state. Harnish v. Carbonell, 328 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976). The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED. SMITH, J., concurs. McCORD, C. J., dissents.…
-
Nico Membiela Supper Club, Inc. v. Lanier, 379 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Wright v. Cade, 349 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Harnish v. Carbonell, 328 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).…
Authorities Cited
- Vickers v. State, 303 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Smith v. State, 305 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Pickles v. State, 313 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 1975)