THE FLORIDA BAR, PETITIONER. IN RE PETITION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE INTEGRATION RULE OF THE FLORIDA BAR
THE FLORIDA BAR, PETITIONER. IN RE PETITION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE INTEGRATION RULE OF THE FLORIDA BAR
329 So. 2d 1
Florida Supreme Court (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The motion for an implementing order filed by The Florida Bar pursuant to the opinion of this Court in this case filed on July 9, 1975, 316 So. 2d 52, is hereby granted and the Court approves the “Master Charge Attorney Participant Agreement” for use by Sun First National Bank of Orlando and its Master Charge agent, affiliate and member banks.
The Court further approves the “Master Charge Attorney Participant Agreement” for use by all other Florida banks offering the Master Charge service that elect to use this identical form of agreement.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., ROBERTS, ADKINS and ENGLAND, JJ., and CHAP-PELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Court Judges, concurring.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harrop B. Phillips and Anor R. Phillips v. Guin & Hunt, Inc., 344 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1977)…service on him.”6 In Grisson v. Dade County, 293 So. 2d 59 (Fla.1974), we suggested that the Legislature could constitutionally authorize alternative procedures for giving notice where personal service was impossible. See also Sheppard v. Sheppard, 329 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1976). The constitutionality of the Legislature’s methodology depends on whether it is reasonably calculated to give notice of the pending action. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., supra. We hold that it does. In Sheppard v. Sheppard…
Authorities Cited
- In re THE Florida BAR, 316 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1975)