STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LARRY DAVID GAMBLE, DEFENDANT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF,
LARRY DAVID GAMBLE, DEFENDANT
330 So. 2d 188
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1976)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
For the hereinafter stated reason, we decline to answer the question herein certified to us by the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.6, subd. a.
In view of the factual statements, which are sparse in certain material respects, it is clear that this court’s answer to the question would not be dispositive of the entire cause. Niemi v. Mebane Oil Co., Fla.App. 4th, 1974, 303 So. 2d 661; Iorio v. State, Fla.App.4th, 1974, 297 So. 2d 116; University of Tampa, Inc. v. Hillsborough County, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 287 So. 2d 708.
CERTIFICATE DENIED.
McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Iorio v. State, 297 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
- Niemi v. Mebane OIL Co., Inc., 303 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
- Williams v. State, 287 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
- Buford Millett v. Travelers Indem. Co., 287 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)