ROBERT PAUL SHELEY, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT; ROBERT PAUL SHELEY, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant in Case No. Y-S19 having filed an untimely notice of appeal, and he having thereafter filed an application for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Hollingshead v. Wainwright, Sup.Ct.Fla.1967, 194 So. 2d 577 and Baggett v. Wainwright, Sup.Ct.Fla.1970, 229 So. 2d 239, and this Court having thereupon entered an order granting full appellate review pursuant to said opinions and thereafter having granted a motion to consolidate said cases and treat as a single appeal, and a review of the record and briefs having failed to reflect prejudicial error, the judgment, conviction and sentence so appealed are
AFFIRMED.
BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Trend Coin Co. v. Honeywell, Inc., 487 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1986)…ence is not to be considered harmful or prejudicial error where other substantially similar evidence has been admitted. Corbett v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, 375 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1202 (1980); Connell v. Green, 330 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Also, the trial court was well within its broad discretion in excluding the insurance application. This was a matter of weighing the probative value of the evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice or confusion of the…
-
State v. Alvarez, 490 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…by the fact that the salient portions of the expert’s testimony were otherwise brought to the jury’s attention. See Corbett v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, 375 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1202 (Fla.1980); Connell v. Green, 330 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Aiken v. Miller, 298 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Affirmed.…
-
Blanco v. State, 89 So. 3d 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…ent defense and should not have been excluded. See Morris v. State, 487 So. 2d 291 (Fla.1986). Where evidence is presented to the jury in violation of a motion in limine, however, any error in its initial exclusion is harmless. See Connell v. Green, 330 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Here, the jury heard all of the evidence complained of notwithstanding the motion in limine. Therefore, the trial court’s ruling excluding the evidence was harmless. Next, Blanco contends that the trial court erred in denying d…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Baggett v. Louie L. Wainwright, 229 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 1969)
- Cleveland Hollingshead v. Louie L. Wainwright, 194 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1967)