HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, D/B/A NORTH FLORIDA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PETITIONERS,
v.
GLENDA ANN DIXON, INDIVIDUALLY, AS WIFE AND AS LEGAL GUARDIAN OF JOHN JUDD DIXON, A MENTAL AND PHYSICAL INCOMPETENT, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Hospital's petition for certiorari denied; trial court properly ordered production of incident reports without requiring plaintiff to show need, as hospital failed to establish the reports were privileged work product prepared in anticipation of litigation.
Incident reports are discoverable without a showing of need when the party claiming privilege provides no evidence that the documents were prepared in anticipation of litigation.
[1] Work product privilege for documents prepared in anticipation of litigation requires the party asserting the privilege to present evidence supporting the claim; absent su…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA hospital sought to withhold incident reports documenting patient falls from beds and wheelchairs from February 1973 to December 1975 in response to …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anticipation Of Litigation cases and more on FLexlaw
SMITH, Judge.
By petition for certiorari the hospital asserts the trial court departed from essential requirements of law in ordering produced for inspection by plaintiff “all Incident Reports” prepared by the hospital from February 1973 until the date of the order, December 1, 1975, “regarding incidents where patients fell from their beds and wheel chairs while in the hospital . . . .”
The material requested is relevant. Rule 1.280(b)(1), R.C.P. The question is whether the incident reports are privileged documents prepared in anticipation of litigation by the hospital for its insurer and so are discoverable only on a showing that plaintiff has need of the materials in preparation of her case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain a substantial equivalent of the reports by other means. Rule 1.280(b)(2), R.C.P. In the absence of evidence supporting the hospital’s assertion that the documents are of a privileged nature, we are unable to fault the trial court for failing, if in fact the court did fail, to require that plaintiff make the showing specified by Rule 1.280 as amended in 1972. Surette v. Gallardo, 323 So. 2d 53 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975). The petition is
DENIED.
MILLS, Acting C. J., and CAWTHON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, concur.