FRANCISCO FUSTER-ESCALONA, APPELLANT,
v.
STEVEN J. WISOTSKY AND NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC., A/K/A NOVA UNIVERSITY, SHEPARD BROAD LAW CENTER, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1998-07-29
No. 96-1820
WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., Associate Judge, concur.
715 So. 2d 1053 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998) Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion of February 11,1998, and substitute the following in its place.

This is an appeal from a final order of dismissal for appellant’s failure to prosecute this legal malpractice action for more than one year pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). In the absence of valid record activity for the year preceding the motion for dismissal and in the absence of sufficient record evidence of good cause for appellant’s failure to prosecute this claim, we cannot conclude that the trial court’s dismissal was an abuse of discretion. See Toney v. Freeman, 600 So. 2d 1099, 1100 (Fla.1992)(stating that “[rjecord activity must be more than a mere passive effort to keep the case on the docket; the activity must constitute an affirmative act to hasten the suit to judgment.”). In our view, the mere filing of a motion to recuse the trial judge, without any attempt to set the motion for hearing, is not sufficient to excuse a plaintiffs lack of record activity during the year in which the motion — not noticed for hearing— remained pending.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky, 781 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2000)
    …PER CURIAM. We have for review Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky, 715 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Lukowsky v. [*1064] Hauser & Metsch, P.A., 677 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The conflict issue is whether a…
    1 / 2
  • Totura & Co., Inc. v. Williams, 754 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 2000)
    …man, 600 So. 2d 1099, 1100 (Fla.1992). Hence, we strongly encourage litigants to affirmatively move their cases along or face dismissal for failure to prosecute under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e).7 See, e.g., Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky, 715 So. 2d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (affirming dismissal because “mere filing of a motion to recuse the trial judge, without any attempt to set the motion for hearing, is not sufficient to excuse a plaintiffs lack of record activity” during preceding year) (e…
  • Robbie v. Dwyn Daniels Robbie, 726 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …pt was entered. When a judge is presented with a motion for disqualification, he or she should immediately rule on the sufficiency of the motion prior to passing on any other matters pertaining to the same litigants. See Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky, 715 So. 2d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(trial court erred in passing on motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute while motion for recusal was pending); Loevinger v. Northrup, 624 So. 2d 374, 375-76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)(when faced with a recu-sal motion, judge sh…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw