STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

IMAN CROSS, A/K/A INMAN CROSS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Schreidell v. Rabbi Bernard P. Shoter, 500 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …) the facts in the case supported giving the instruction, and c)the instruction was necessary for the jury to properly resolve the issues in the case. Davis v. Charter Mortgage Co., 385 So. 2d 1173, 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (citing Davis v. Lewis, 331 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)), cert. denied, 348 So. 2d 946 (Fla.1977); see Alderman v. Wysong & Miles Co., 486 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). A verdict will not be set aside, however, merely because the court failed to give instructions which might properl…
• Sears v. McKENZIE, 502 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …ts in the case supported a giving of the instructions, and that the instructions were necessary for the jury to properly resolve the issues in the case. Davis v. Charter Mortgage Co., 385 So. 2d 1173, 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (citing Davis v. Lewis, 331 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So. 2d 946 (Fla.1977)). The standard for reviewing the failure to give a jury instruction is “whether ... there was a reasonable possibility that the jury could have been misled by the failure to give the instr…
• Norval M. GUY v. Kight, 431 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …346 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The issues for the jury’s consideration were sufficiently covered and the instructions given were manifestly full, fair and accurate. See De Bold v. Ocean Reef Club, 368 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Davis v. Lewis, 331 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Lynch v. McGovern, 270 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). The trial court had the initial responsibility of determining the qualifications and range of subjects on which the expert witnesses were allowed to testify and its determi…

Authorities Cited

• Thomas v. State, 250 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)