WILLIAM BUCOLO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; RONALD A. SIMPSON, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; JAMES R. AGUT, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; WILLIAM BUCOLO AND JAMES R. AGUT, APPELLANTS, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1976-04-28
Nos. 38280, 38279, 38278, 38424
OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
332 So. 2d 25 Florida Supreme Court (1976)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reconsider our opinion in the instant case appearing at 316 So. 2d 551 (1975), pursuant to the direction of the United States Supreme Court in Bucolo v. Adkins, — U.S. —, 96 S.Ct. 1086, 47 L.Ed.2d 301, 44 U.S.L.W. 3500 (1976). That Court, referring to its opinion in Bucolo v. Florida, 421 U.S. 927, 95 S.Ct. 1651, 44 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975), held this state was “clearly foreclosed” from proceeding further in this cause.

In accordance therewith, the convictions of appellants are reversed and they are hereby discharged from further response to these proceedings.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw