ANNIE RUTH PUGH
v.
JOHN PUGH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a bill of review seeking to overturn a prior divorce decree. The court found no reversible error in the record.
No, the chancellor did not err in dismissing the bill of complaint. The Florida Supreme Court found no reversible error in the record.
“We have carefully perused the transcript of the record in the light of briefs filed and oral argument before this Court and find reflected therein no reversible error.”
This quote establishes the court's basis for affirming the lower court's decision.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe plaintiff, Annie Ruth Pugh, was granted a divorce decree in July 1942. In October 1942, she filed a bill of complaint in the nature of a bill of r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Final Decree Of Divorce cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant here was plaintiff in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Osceola County in a divorce suit and prevailed in that suit, having a decree rendered in her favor granting each and every prayer of her bill of complaint, which decree was entered on July 15, 1942.
On October 24, 1942, she filed her bill of complaint,- being an original bill in the nature of bill of review of the final decree of divorce. The defendant answered, incorporating motion to dismiss in the answer. Testimony was taken on the bill and answer before a special examiner appointed by the court and, on consideration thereof, the chancellor entered his decree dismissing the bill of complaint.
We have carefully perused the transcript of the record in the light of briefs filed and oral argument before this Court and find reflected therein no reversible error.
Therefore, the decree should be and is affirmed.
So ordered.
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.