CATHERINE TAYLOR

v.

HUGH CULBREATH, AS SHERIFF ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Byrd v. State, 80 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 1955)
  …ng HOBSON, Justice. In his petition for rehearing or modification of our opinion in this case, the Attorney General contends that we failed to consider our holdings in Brown v. State, 152 Fla. 853, 13 So. 2d 458, and State v. Pridgen, 155 Fla. 31, 19 So. 2d 510, 511, to the effect that moonshine whiskey is a beverage in respect to which no tax may be levied or collected. In the Brown and Pridgen cases the information used the term “moonshine whiskey” and alleged that it was a beverage upon which a tax was…
• Texaco Boca DEL MAR, Inc. v. Sentinel Dev. Corp., 402 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …ent from that contained in a seller’s listing, the offer becomes a counter-offer, and the seller is not liable to a procuring broker if the seller rejects such a counteroffer. Salzer v. Anderson, 238 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1970); Taylor v. Dorsey, 155 Fla. 67, 19 So. 2d 876 (1944). A variance in stated financial terms that is unacceptable to the seller, relieves the seller of the obligation to pay a brokerage commission. C. W. Kistler Co. v. Hotel Martinique, 44 So. 2d 288 (Fla.1950); Singer v. Grant, In…
• State v. Azie Ellis, 78 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 1955)
  …te of Florida of such tax or any part thereof, shall be guilty of a felony * * The trial judge quashed the amended information, predicating his ruling upon the cases of Brown v. State, 152 Fla. 853, 13 So. 2d 458, and State v. Pridgen, 155 Fla. 31, 19 So. 2d 510. This is an appeal by the State of Florida from such order. The question for determination is whether the amended information charges an offense under the second prohibition of the statute, quoted supra. In the Brown case [152 Fla. 853, 13 So. 2d 4…

  ← 1 / 2 →