OCEAN MILE LTD., APPELLANT,
v.
WILLARD WALKER, APPELLEE
OCEAN MILE LTD., APPELLANT,
WILLARD WALKER, APPELLEE
334 So. 2d 56
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment and denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon considering the record, the briefs, the order appealed from and the oral arguments of counsel, we find that there were unresolved material issues of fact as to whether or not appellee and Robert Mann agreed that Robert Mann would put together or produce any group to purchase the property or that he himself would be one of a group of persons who would purchase the property.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Kurtz, 354 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)…l procedure. The Appellee voluntarily took himself out of Rule 3.191 and his vague attempt to unilaterally impose another 180 days restriction effects nothing. State ex rel. Butler v. Cullen, 253 So. 2d 861 (Fla.1971); State ex rel. Gadson v. Tyson, 334 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Although again it really doesn’t matter, Appellee’s attorney’s Motion [*892] for Continuance specifically waives the Speedy Trial Rule and no attempted restriction is contained therein. State v. Abrams, 350 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 4th…
-
Albert Banks v. State, 691 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…State v. Duda, 368 So. 2d 918, 919-920 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); State v. Kurtz, 354 So. 2d 890, 891-892 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 360 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.1978); State v. Abrams, 350 So. 2d 1104, 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); State ex rel. Godson v. Tyson, 334 So. 2d 56, 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Finding no fault with the state, Appellant’s argument is that he should not lose his right to seek a speedy trial discharge simply because the court scheduled his first trial date for only three weeks after arraignment. How…
-
State v. Reese, 359 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)…firmance of these two cases now before us would normally not merit an opinion. However, the State here argues that, neither the district courts, nor the Supreme Court, have followed Negron. To this end, the State eites State ex rel. Gadson v. Tyson, 334 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) and Coppola v. State, 318 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1975) affirmed, 337 So. 2d 779 (Fla.1976). In Gadson, supra, we had a similar sequence of events to those now before us, except for the vitally important distinction that the mo…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence