ANN TIBALDEO, APPELLANT,

v.

VICTOR LOUIS TIBALDEO, APPELLEE; VICTOR L. TIBALDEO, APPELLANT, V. ANN TIBALDEO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cross v. Lakeview Ctr., Inc., 529 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …standard of care was error, the facts as stated above do not show that the error was reversible. § 59.041, Fla.Stat. Dr. Monahan’s testimony was cumulative to the testimony of Drs. Tingle and Dietz. Eckert v. Government Employees Insurance Company, 334 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). The testimony in question was not substantially different in character and effect from properly admitted evidence and resulted in no undue prejudice to appellant. The record below leaves no doubt that the error below was harmless…
• Luisa Rodriguez v. Travelers Ins. Co., 367 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …ion to the contrary,3 we hold that its existence precludes the plaintiff’s attempt, in effect, to reduce the amount paid based upon “equitable principles.” We think this result is required by our decision in Eckert v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 334 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).4 The court there cited the DeCes-pedes case, supra, which involved medical pay coverage, in support of the conclusion that equitable distribution was not applicable, in the absence of statute, to payments made by an uninsured mot…
• Butcher v. Miami Elevator Co., Inc., 568 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …umped. Other hearsay evidence of the plaintiff’s actions, although erroneously admitted, was cumulative and for that reason was harmless. Foster’s Auto Crushing v. Wood, 427 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Eckert v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 334 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Affirmed. . There was no allegation of an inability to proceed because of the destruction of evidence. See Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co., 562 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), and cases collected.…

Authorities Cited

• Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)