GAY ET AL.
v.
RUTHERFORD ET AL.

Fla. | 1954-05-25
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur
73 So. 2d 60 Florida Supreme Court (1954)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case concerns the duration of liens for intangible personal property taxes on real property in Florida. The court affirmed a lower court's decision that these liens became void after seven years from the issuance of executions, as dictated by a 1941 statute.


Holding

Yes, the court held that the liens for intangible personal property taxes on real property became void after seven years from the date of the issuance of executions, as provided by the 1941 statute.


Key Quotes

“the Court finds and holds that in repealing Chapter 15,789, Florida. Laws of 1931, and enacting Chapter 20,724, Acts of Florida, 1941, wherein provision was made for collecting intangible personal property taxes by executions, which method was not a part of the 1931 Act, and providing that such executions were good and valid for only seven years from the date of their issuance and thereafter were void and, of no force and effect, it must have been and was the intention of the Legislature to limit the duration of the tax lien to the life of the execution, as otherwise there would have been little or no reason for enacting Chapter 20,724, Acts of 1941, and repealing Chapter 15,789, Acts of 1931.”

This quote explains the lower court's reasoning for limiting the duration of the tax lien.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellants sought to enforce liens for intangible personal property taxes on real property. The Circuit Court of Pinellas County found that these lien…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Justice.

MATHEWS, Justice.

This Í9 an appeal from a final decree entered by the Circuit Court of Pinellas County finding that the liens for intangible personal property taxes on real property became void under Chapter 20,724 Acts of Florida 1941, F.S.A. § 199.01 et seq., after seven years from the date of the issuance of executions.

In and by the final decree the Chancellor held:

“ * * * the Court finds and holds that in repealing Chapter 15,789, Florida. Laws of 1931, and enacting Chapter 20,724, Acts of Florida, 1941, wherein provision was made for collecting intangible personal property taxes by executions, which method was not a part of the 1931 Act, and providing that such executions were good and valid for only seven years from the date of their issuance and thereafter were void and, of no force and effect, it must have been and was the intention of the Legislature to limit the duration of the tax lien to the life of the execution, as otherwise there would have been little or no reason for enacting Chapter 20,724, Acts of 1941, and repealing Chapter 15,789, Acts of 1931.”

After making .the above finding the Court then ordered and adjudged that the liens in question no longer existed and' that they had expired and were of no force or effect as to real estate involved, and that such real estate was no longer encumbered with the liens on account of the said taxes.

The appellants insist that the liens continue to encumber the real estate until the taxes are paid and cite 84 G.J.S., Taxation, § 595, to the effect that, “In the absence of a statutory provision as to the duration of the lien, it continues until the tax is paid.” This contention may be true but in the case now presented there is a statutory provision and under this statute the Chancellor correctly held that the liens against the real estate were void.

The appellants failed to meet the burden of showing any reversible error in the final decree.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw