STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF,

v.

HENRY TRAFFICANTE, DEFENDANT

Citator

Cited By

• Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1959)
  …s thought the court said that the earlier cases seemed to recognize a broader discretion in the trial judge than the later ones. Recognition of different rules in this respect was expressed in Labruzzo v. Atlantic Dredging & Construction Co., Fla., 73 So. 2d 228, when the court frankly said that two rules had been followed, one, that presence of “substantial competent evidence” and absence of any showing the jury had been deceived about the force and credibility of the evidence or influenced by outside cons…
• Fla. Indus. Comm'n v. Nordin, 101 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)
  …ght and probative force of the evidence and the justice of the cause may be set aside by an appellate court. See Ruth v. Sorenson, Fla.1958, — So. 2d -; Yappa v. Bennett, Fla.1955, 80 So. 2d 600; Labruzzo v. Atlantic Dredging & Const. Co., Fla.1954, 73 So. 2d 228, 229; Renuart Lumber Yards, Inc., v. Levine, Fla.1950, 49 So. 2d 97. It seems to us to be equally, *if not more, essential that an appellate court have this same power with reference to the findings of an administrative body like that in the presen…
• Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Helwig, 108 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
  …ial granted simply because the jury’s verdict does not accord with the trial court’s view of the evidence and justice of the case where there is substantial evidence supporting the verdict. Labruzzo v. Atlantic Dredging & Construction Co., Fla.1954, 73 So. 2d 228; W. B. Harbeson Lumber Co. v. Anderson, 102 Fla. 731, 136 So. 557; Tillman v. Lodge, 102 Fla. 229, 135 So. 524; Charlotte County v. Chadwick, 102 Fla. 163, 135 So. 502; Triay v. Seals, 92 Fla. 310, 109 So. 427; Jackson Bros. Lumber Co. v. Yaeger & M…

Authorities Cited

• Schwob Co. of Fla. v. Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 152 Fla. 203 (Fla. 1942)