DOUGLAS ALLIGOOD AND MABEL ALLIGOOD, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,

v.

BLANCHE ROGERS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Slavin v. Sanford KAY, 108 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1958)
  …eted and accepted by the owner. The court observed that there were many exceptions to the rule, and that a class of these had been recognized in Breeding’s Dania Drug Co. v. Runyan, 147 Fla. 123, 2 So. 2d 376, and Carter v. Livesay Window Co., Fla., 73 So. 2d 411. We have re-examined those cases, while bearing in mind the amendment made after our mandate issued, containing the charge that the plumbing company knew or should have known that “its failure to exercise reasonable care in the * * * installation cr…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Tucker Bros., Inc. v. Menard, 90 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1956)
  …at appellants and their Foreman in charge had been requested to guard against the possibility of the particular injury that here apparently resulted. There is little, if anything, to distinguish this case from Carter v. Livesay Window Co., Fla.1954, 73 So. 2d 411; and Cockerham v. R. E. Vaughan, Inc., Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 890. Appellants’ contention that there was no direct and positive proof that the child was injured on the Tucker land has caused us more concern. It is true that no one testified that he ac…
• Cockerham v. R. E. Vaughan, Inc., 82 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1955)
  …ons were taken of an officer of the appellee corporation and of an owner of the land. Pursuant to motion of ap-pellee, the trail court entered a summary final judgment in its favor. This case is controlled by Carter v. Livesay Window Co., Fla.1954, 73 So. 2d 411, 413, subsequent to the date of the final judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted. Thus it will be observed that the trial court did not have the benefit of that decision before it at the time of ’'the ruling in this case. '• Carter v. Livesay…