ALBERT BACRAC, APPELLANT,
v.
CLARENCE E. PREVATT, AS CONSTABLE, DISTRICT I, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALBERT BACRAC, APPELLANT,
CLARENCE E. PREVATT, AS CONSTABLE, DISTRICT I, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
73 So. 2d 416
Florida Supreme Court (1954)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed,' with leave to petitioner-appellant to amend his pleadings before the Honorable Henry C. Tillman, Circuit Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, in such manner as to create the issue of whether or not petitioner-appellant is a fugitive from justice in accordance with' the case of Kuney v. State, 88 Fla. 534, 102 So. 547.
ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alterman Transp. Line v. Carter, 88 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1955)…icate holder, the commission shall grant same only when the existing certificate holder or holders serving such territory fail to provide service and facilities which may reasonably be required by the commission.” In Redwing Carriers v. Mack, Fla., 73 So. 2d 416, we were confronted with a situation where, by reason of technological development, a new product (liquefied petroleum gas) requiring an entirely new type of transportation service was about to be made available to the public in a particular area. E…1 / 3
-
Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Carter, 80 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 1954)…re from tjie e.ssejitial requirements of the law to grant the .permit to the applicants. See Great Southern Trucking Co. v. Mack, Fla.1951, 54 So. 2d 153. This case is to be distinguished on.' the . facts from Redwing Carriers, Inc., v. Mack, Fla., 73 So. 2d 416, 420. The fact presented there did not show that the existing certificate holders (had rendered poor, Inadequate and unsatisfactory service over a''long period of' time as was the case in Great Southern Trucking Co. v. Mack, supra, nor did' the fact…1 / 2
-
ACE Delivery Serv., Inc. v. Boyd, 111 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1959)…L. & S. Trucking Corp. v. Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, Fla.1956, 89 So. 2d 339. In Alterman Transport Line v. Carter, supra, we undertook to explain the reasons for the exception announced in Redwing Carriers v. Mack, Fla.1954, 73 So. 2d 416. In order to make our position clear on this problem, which apparently has been the product of some confusion following these recent decisions, we herewith state that the rule of Redwing Carriers v. Mack, supra, is to be confined within the limited…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Clark G. Kuney v. State of Fla. & J. L. Hampton, 88 Fla. 354 (Fla. 1924)