DOROTHEA J. BARNES, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD M. BARNES, MARGARET LOUISE BARNES AND ANNA DUNDORE, APPELLEES
DOROTHEA J. BARNES, APPELLANT,
EDWARD M. BARNES, MARGARET LOUISE BARNES AND ANNA DUNDORE, APPELLEES
73 So. 2d 675
Florida Supreme Court (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed but without prejudice to the right of Dorothea J. Barnes to pursue any common-law remedy of which she may be advised.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING, HOBSON, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Gilda Dahlberg, 115 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)…complained of. Woods-Hoskins-Young Co. v. Taylor Development Co., 98 Fla. 156, 122 So. 224, 225. “It is fundamental that it is only upon the record before us that we are authorized to review the actions of the lower Court.” Bryant v. Kuhn, Fla.1954, 73 So. 2d 675, 676. A decree of the trial court comes to the appellate court with a presumption of its correctness, and the burden is on the appellant to show its error. An appellant cannot sustain that burden where facts essential to its establishment, though th…
-
Small v. Craftmaster OF Brevard, Inc., 863 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Bryant v. Kuhn, 73 So. 2d 675 (Fla.1954); West v. West, 436 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Adams v. Freel, 409 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). SHARP, W., PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.…