LOUIS GILLARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LOUIS GILLARD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
73 So. 2d 677
Florida Supreme Court (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have examined and considered the record in this case in the light of briefs filed, and have also reviewed the evidence, pursuant to subparagraph’ (2) of section 924.32, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., to determine if the interests of justice require a new trial, with a result that we find that no reversible error is made to appear and that the evidence does not reveal that the ends of justice require that a new trial be awarded.
Affirmed.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, SEBRING, HOBSON, MATHEWS and DREW) JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryon Elliott Stratton v. State, 77 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 1955)…, and he clearly did not come within the rule applied in those cases where, because of extreme youth, inexperience, illiteracy, etc., a prisoner who pleads guilty without benefit of counsel may be permitted to withdraw his plea. Paul v. State, Fla., 73 So. 2d 677. To the contrary, it appears incontrovertibly that the defendant was a mature man, college-educated, and thoroughly competent to understand the charges against him. Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion that the court below did not abuse…