GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER J. DAMMERT AND MARY JO DAMMERT, APPELLEES
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
WALTER J. DAMMERT AND MARY JO DAMMERT, APPELLEES
335 So. 2d 583
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Government Employees Insurance Company brings this appeal from a declaratory judgment which held that the provisions in a policy upon two automobiles against stacking of uninsured motorist coverage were ineffective. The uninsured motorist coverage in these policies was the same as that dealt with in Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Farmer, Fla.App.1976, 330 So. 2d 236. See also State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anderson, Fla.App.1976, 332 So. 2d 623 (released April 23, 1976).
Based upon the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Florida in Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Fla.1973, 288 So. 2d 238, and the above cited cases, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Furman, 341 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…we expressly relied upon Tucker in affirming a lower court’s declaration which held that provisions in a policy upon two automobiles against stacking of uninsured motorist coverage were ineffective. Government Employees Insurance Company v. Dammert, 335 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Therefore, based upon the above authority, we are of the opinion that the trial judge was correct in declaring that the uninsured motor vehicle coverage afforded each automobile in the policy could properly be stacked. See State…
Authorities Cited
- Tucker v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 288 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1973)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 332 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
- Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Farmer, 330 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)