DWIGHT LEON ORR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DWIGHT LEON ORR, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
335 So. 2d 584
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
See: Franklin v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So. 2d 461; Bernhardt v. State, Fla. 1974, 288 So. 2d 490; Randolph v. State, Fla.App.1974, 292 So. 2d 374.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Credit Alliance Corp. v. Timmco Equip., Inc., 457 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…entering into the stipulation and settling the first replevin suit. We reject that argument because the stipulation did not involve an abandonment of the usurious note and the execution of a new note at lawful interest as did Munilla v. Perez-Cobo, 335 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), relied on by CAC. Next, CAC suggests the transaction was exempt from the usury statutes by virtue of Section 687.04(1), Florida Statutes (1981). However, the evidence in this case clearly demonstrates the inapplicability of the s…
-
Park Ave. Inv. & Dev., Inc. v. Barkheimer, 471 U.S. 1108 (U.S. 1985)…appeal or petition for writ of certiorari is frivolous, the Court may award the appellee or the respondent appropriate damages.” Nor could any such allegation be made; Gunn Plumbing has been followed consistently. See, e. g., Munilla v. Perez-Cobo, 335 So. 2d 584 (Fla. App. 1976), cert. denied, 344 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1977). See also Morgan Walton Properties, Inc. v. International City Bank & Trust Co., 404 So. 2d 1059, 1062 (Fla. 1981).…
Authorities Cited
- Gideon Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1974)
- Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Franklin v. State, 226 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)