STATE EX REL. FLORIDA BAR
v.
JARVIS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court disbarred attorney Harry M. Jarvis for embezzling $3,500 in client funds. Jarvis accepted a cashier's check from his client intended for a third party but instead deposited and converted the funds to his own use, constituting gross professional misconduct.
Jarvis was guilty of gross professional misconduct and unprofessional conduct that disqualifies him from practicing law. He is disbarred from the practice of law in Florida.
“respondent embezzled the proceeds of the said cashier's check, the same being funds entrusted to him by his client”
Establishes the core misconduct: conversion of entrusted client funds
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn May 1952, Jarvis's client Sidney G. Leslie purchased a $3,500 cashier's check payable to Mrs. Olive H. Brown to settle a claim. Jarvis was expected…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unprofessional Conduct cases and more on FLexlaw
TERRELL, Justice.
Pursuant to Article XI, Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A., a complaint was filed against respondent charging him
with unprofessional conduct as an attorney at law, in that he did on May 6, 1952, accept a cashier’s check in the sum of $3,500 from his client Sidney G. Leslie who purchased it from the Florida National Bank of Orlando, that said check was payable to Mrs. Olive H. Brown, that respondent was expected to deliver said cashier’s check to Mrs. Brown in settlement of a claim but that instead respondent, on May 10, 1952, deposited said check in the First National Bank of Orlando and converted it to his own use.
A referee was appointed, respondent was served with, notice of the complaint, including the time and place of hearing and the charge against him, but he did not appear in person or otherwise to resist the charges. Evidence was taken by the complainant which established conclusively every element of the complaint, that respondent embezzled the proceeds of the said cashier’s check, the same being funds entrusted to him by his client and that he said nothing in defense of the charge.
The referee found respondent guilty of gross professional misconduct and recommended that he be disbarred. The Board of Governors of the Florida Bar approved the report and recommendation of the referee and recommend to this Court that an order be entered disbarring respondent, Harry M. Jarvis, from the practice of law in the State of Florida. All proceedings in the cause have been certified to this Court with recommendation as detailed.
The record, the report, and recommendation of the referee and the Board of Gov ernors of the Florida Bar, have been thoroughly examined and reveal conclusively that respondent has been guilty of such conduct as disqualifies him to practice law as pointed out in State of Florida ex rel. Florida Bar v. Murrell, Fla., 74 So. 2d 221, is present and proven.
It is accordingly the judgment of this Court that respondent, Harry M. Jarvis, was regularly charged, tried and found guilty of unprofessional conduct as an attorney, that he should be and is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in this State.
ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, SE-BRING, HOBSON, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Iric Vonn Spears, 786 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 2001)…r v. Burton, 218 So. 2d 748, 749 (Fla.1969) (“The judgment of disbarment is certainly justified when an attorney misappropriates funds which he receives by virtue of his fiduciary relationship with his client.”); State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Jarvis, 74 So. 2d 228 (Fla.1954) (embezzlement of client funds is unprofessional conduct which justifies disbarment). That lesser discipline was deemed appropriate in Krasnove, Boland, and Corces does not alter this fundamental precept of attorney discipline in Florida.…
Authorities Cited
- State ex rel. Fla. BAR v. Murrell, 74 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 1954)