STATE EX REL. FLORIDA BAR
v.
CAFFEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court disbarred attorney Wilson R. Caffee for misappropriating client funds totaling $7,500 and $500 on two separate occasions, conduct for which he was convicted of grand larceny. The Court found his criminal convictions constituted grounds for disbarification under Florida Bar rules.
The Court held that Caffee's convictions for grand larceny arising from the misappropriation of client funds constitute unprofessional conduct disqualifying him from practice, and ordered his disbarment from the practice of law in Florida.
“he did (1) On August 8, 1952, appropriate to his own use the sum of $500 the property of his client, and (2) that he did on May 26, 1952, appropriate to his own use the sum of $7,500, the property of another client”
Establishes the specific factual bases for the disciplinary charges against the attorney.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRespondent Caffee was charged with two counts of appropriating client funds to his own use: $500 on August 8, 1952, and $7,500 on May 26, 1952. He was…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Extenuating Circumstances cases and more on FLexlaw
TERRELL, Justice.
Pursuant to Article XI, Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, an amended complaint was filed against respondent charging him with unprofessional conduct as an attorney at law, in that he did (1) On August 8, 1952, appropriate to his own use the sum of $500 the property of his client, and (2) that he did on May 26, 1952, appropriate to his own use the sum of $7,500, the property of another client, that he was indicted, tried and convicted for grand larceny in Pinellas County, Florida, on both charges and was sentenced to serve a term of five years in the State Penitentiary in each case, the sentences to run concurrently.
A referee was appointed, respondent was served with notice of the complaint; he entered a-plea of guilty to each of the charges and filed no responsive pleading to the complaint. Evidence was taken which consisted mainly of the record of his indictment, trial, and conviction for grand larceny. He offered no evidence in his defense but did request an opportunity to produce testimony of extenuating circumstances which was denied for absence of any reasonable excuse for not having such testimony at the trial.
The referee found respondent guilty of “acts which by the law of Florida constituted felonies” and recommended that he be disbarred. The Board of Governors of the Florida Bar approved the report and recommendation of the referee and recommend to this Court that an order be entered disbarring respondent, Wilson R. Caffee from the practice of law in the State of Florida. The record in the cause has been certified to this Court.
The record, the report and recommendation of the referee and the Board of Governors of the Florida Bar have been considered and we think it shows that respondent has been guilty of such conduct as disqualifies him to practice law. Every element showing ground for disqualification as pointed out in State of Florida ex rel. Florida Bar v. Murrell, Fla., 74 So. 2d 221, is present in the instant case. It is accordingly the' judgment of this Court that respondent, Wilson R. Caffee, was regularly charged, tried and found guilty of unprofessional conduct as an attorney, that he should be and is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in this State.
ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, SE-BRING, HOBSON, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Evans, 94 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1957)…explain the circumstances and otherwise offer testimony in excuse or in mitigation of the penalty. In the instant case this procedure was followed. The respondent was given a full and complete hearing. State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Caffee, Fla.1954, 74 So. 2d 229. He had every opportunity to explain the facts and circumstances preceding and surrounding the adjudication of guilt pursuant to his plea of nolo contendere. His unfortunate physical condition was elaborated upon in great detail starting with the ye…
Authorities Cited
- State ex rel. Fla. BAR v. Murrell, 74 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 1954)