MILDRED A. SELLERS, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ANNELLE SELLERS, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES EDWIN SKIPPER ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1976-07-27
No. AA-215
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
336 So. 2d 130 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This is a dissenting opinion arguing that the listing agreement in the instant case, unlike in prior cases, did not contain a specific agreement allowing the owner to arbitrarily refuse to close without liability for a brokerage commission.


Holding

The dissenting judge believes the listing agreement in the instant case is more akin to Mark v. Hahn, implying the seller did not reserve the right to arbitrarily refuse to close without commission liability.


Facts & Procedural History

The dissenting judge discusses prior cases, Hanover Realty Corp. v. Codomo and Mark v. Hahn, which involved brokerage commission disputes and the inte…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Interlocutory appeal dismissed. Hanley v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Fla., 334 So. 2d 11, opinion filed May 28, 1976, rehearing denied July 16, 1976.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Carroll v. Agatha Ann Carroll, 344 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
    …t the trial court’s finding that appellant violated the previous order of the trial court granting custody to the maternal grandmother.3 The order appealed is REVERSED. RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur. . Carroll v. Carroll, 336 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). . As punishment for his contempt, appellant was ordered to pay appellee’s attorney a fee of $150.00 and $7.50 costs. . The trial court observed: “It [order] doesn’t say a thing about notifying Mrs. Burkett [maternal grandmoth…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw