WILLIAM EDWARD BLIZZARD, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)

Citator

Cited By

• Shapiro v. State, 390 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 1980)
  …st unreasonable searches and seizures since, it explained, the protections of the fourth amendment have nothing to do with promoting the ascertainment of truth at a criminal trial. 412 U.S. at 241-42, 93 S.Ct. at 2055. See also Interest of B. L. J., 336 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Looking to the totality of the circumstances in the present case, we find that Shapiro voluntarily consented to the search. As previously stated, he was fully aware that upon entering the security boarding area of the airport,…
• Doerr v. State, 383 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1980)
  …er law required that the notification be made “at the earliest practicable time.” The amendment required that the notification shall be made “immediately.” This is a prerequisite to any guilt interrogation. In the case of In the Interest of R.L.J., 336 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), cited by the state, the father of the juvenile was notified and replied that he had no objection to the interrogation. In the Interest of W.J.N., 350 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), involved a situation where Miranda warnings w…
• Royer v. State, 389 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …(5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874, 96 S.Ct. 143, 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975); Brown v. Beto, 468 F. 2d 1284 (5th Cir. 1972); Trainer v. State, 346 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cert. denied, 352 So. 2d 175 (Fla.1977); In interest of R. L. J., 336 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); (b) the arrest was unlawful because, whether or not the officers were justified in “encountering” Royer in the concourse, see United States v. Wylie, 186 U.S.App.D.C. 231, 569 F. 2d 62 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 944,…