BRUCE E. BORRI, PETITIONER,

v.

ELAINE M. SIVERSON, ETC., RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Bell v. State, 589 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …ery. We therefore remand for an evidentiary hearing to permit the trial court to determine whether Bell was prejudiced by the trial court’s failure to ascertain whether there was a factual basis for the minimum mandatory sentence. State v. Kendrick, 336 So. 2d 353 (Fla.1976); Williams v. State, 534 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). If he was so prejudiced, such would be grounds for vacating the sentence. In count three, Bell was adjudicated guilty of committing robbery without a firearm, and in count four of r…
• Gust v. State, 558 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …hallenge a guilty or nolo contendere plea on the ground that the trial court failed to make a factual basis determination, a defendant must show “prejudice or manifest injustice.” Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267, 275 (Fla.1975); State v. Kendrick, 336 So. 2d 353, 355 (Fla.1976); Fitzpatrick v. State, 414 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). In this, the defendant has obviously failed. Unlike Kendrick, the defendant has never denied that he was in possession of the knife. The defendant’s contention that the knif…
• Williams v. State, 534 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …lement of the charge. See Williams v. State. The failure of the court to make a complete inquiry, or to receive a complete proffer, will generally not result in reversal on appeal without a corresponding showing of prejudice. See State v. Kendrick, 336 So. 2d 353 (Fla.1976); Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1975); Fitzpatrick v. State, 414 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). However, where the defendant raises the possibility of a defense in the course of his response, the potential prejudice is considere…

  ← 1 / 2 →