JOHN C. RITCH, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)

Citator

Cited By

• Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 685 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1996)
  …on” in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020, and see the judicial construction of “rendition” for an administrative rule in Florida Admin. Comm’n v. Judges of the District Court, 351 So. 2d 712 (Fla.1977), on review of Riley-Field Co. v. Askew, 336 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). This requirement is intended to allow the clerk of the court to determine the timeliness of the notice from its face. The advisory committee intended that defects in the notice would not be jurisdictional or grounds for disposit…
• Agrico Chem. Co. v. State of Fla. Dep't OF Env't Reg. & Sarasota Cnty., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …ed by F.S. 120.54(4)(c) until after the hearing officer has rendered his decision. We agree. This court has recognized that the Legislature intended that the use of the term “adoption” may refer to an act of “approval”. In Riley-Field Co. v. Askew, 336 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), we discussed timing requirements for perfecting appellate review of agency rulemaking. In summarizing the facts, we stated: “* * * [Petitioners seek review of [a rule] which the Administration Commission of the Department of Ad…
• In re Proposed Florida Appellate Rules, 351 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1977)
  …llate Procedure 9.020, and see the judicial construction of “rendition” for an administrative rule in Florida Admin. Comm’n v. Judges of the District Court, 351 So. 2d 712, Case No. 50,242 (Fla. Oct. 14, 1977), on review of Riley-Field Co. v. Askew, 336 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). This requirement is intended to allow the clerk of the court to determine the timeliness of the notice from its face. The Advisory Committee intended that defects in the notice would not be jurisdictional or grounds for disposit…