WILLIAM GLENN

v.

ROYAL CROWN BOTTLING COMPANY, A DISSOLVED CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• City of Miami v. Kichinko, 156 Fla. 128 (Fla. 1945)
  …es of business, and (3) prescribe sanitary regulations for such places of business.” On authority of the opinion and judgments cited by the learned circuit judge, supra, and of our opinion and judgment in the case of Singer, et al., v. Scarborough, 155 Fla. 357, 20 So. (2nd) 126, the opinion and judgment of the circuit court is approved and affirmed. Insofar as our holdings here may appear to be in conflict with what was said in City of Miami Beach, et al., v. State ex rel., 145 Fla. 716, 200 So. 213, the…
• Makos v. Prince, 64 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1953)
  …erages within their corporate limits; and this court has many times held that a municipality has only such power respecting the regulation and control of alcoholic beverages as is given it by the Legislature. See Singer v. Scarborough, 155 Fla. 357, 20 So. 2d 126; City of Miami v. Kichinko, 156 Fla. 128, 22 So. 2d 627; Fleeman v. Vocelle, 160 Fla. 898, 37 So. 2d 164.” [*676] In other words, the city had the right by zoning to establish zones where alcoholic beverages could, or could not, be sold, but had no…
• State v. THE City OF Miami, 156 Fla. 784 (Fla. 1946)
  …oversy here presented and are viz: City of [*790] Miami v. Kitchinko, 156 Fla. 627, 22 So. (2nd) 627; Mechlow v. Vocelle, 156 Fla. 115, 22 So. (2nd) 631; State ex rel. Williams v. City of Miami, 156 Fla. 505, 22 So. (2nd) 505; Singer v. Scarborough, 155 Fla. 357, 20 So. (2nd) 126; City of Miami Beach v. State ex rel. Patrician Hotel Co., 145 Fla. 716, 200 So. 213. We have carefully studied and analyzed the cited authorities in light of the reasons advanced but we are unable to adopt the logic submitted by a…