STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.,
v.
BROWARD DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment in a case involving the Broward Drainage District, finding the issues presented were identical to those in a previously decided case. The court's per curiam opinion relied on its prior ruling for its decision.
Yes, the legal questions were identical to those in the previously decided case.
“The questions raised and considered by the Court below in this case were similar to those raised and considered in State of Florida, et al., v. Everglades Drainage District, et al., decided this date.”
This quote establishes the core reasoning for the court's decision, linking the current case to a prior one.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Broward Drainage District was established by legislative acts in 1921 and subsequently amended. The case involved legal questions similar to those…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The record and the briefs in this case have been examined. We find that Broward Drainage District, the appellee, was created by Chapter 8871, Acts of 1921, later amended by Chapter 10117, Act sof 1925, Chapter 11862, Acts of 1927, and Chapter 18037, Acts of 1937, all of which relate to provisions similar to those in Chapter 6456, Acts of 1913, and other acts affecting the Everglades Drainage District.
The questions raised and considered by the Court below in this case were similar to those raised and considered in State of Florida, et al., v. Everglades Drainage District, et al., *408decided this date. The judgment appealed from is accordingly affirmed on authority of the last cited case.
Affirmed.
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. Ex rel. Bd. of Supervisors of S. Fla. Conservancy Dist. v. Millard F. Caldwell, 160 Fla. 355 (Fla. 1948)…the State were included in the tax program on the theory that they should bear their just portion of the burden of reclamation.” — State v. Everglades Drainage District, 155 Fla. 403, 20 So. (2nd) 397; State v. Napoleon B. Broward Drainage District, 155 Fla. 407, 20 So. (2nd) 399; State v. Lake Worth Drainage District, 155 Fla. 408, 20 So. (2nd) 399. The opinion of this Court prepared by Mr. Justice TERRELL in those cases, when studied in connection with the few but pertinent authorities cited in the opini…
-
Cent. & S. Fla. Flood Control Dist. v. S. Fla. Conservancy Dist. & Pelican Lake Sub-Drainage Dist., 111 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon the authority of State v. Everglades Drainage Dist., 1945, 155 Fla. 403, 20 So. 2d 397; State v. Broward Drainage District, 1945, 155 Fla. 407, 20 So. 2d 399; State v. Lake Worth Drainage District, 1945, 155 Fla. 408, 20 So. 2d 399; State ex rel. Board of Sup’rs of South Florida Conservancy Dist. v. Caldwell, 1948, 160 Fla. 355, 35 So. 2d 642, and State ex rel. Board of Sup’rs of South Florida Conservanc…1 / 2