RODNEY VANCE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RODNEY VANCE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
338 So. 2d 51
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Chesebrough v. State, 255 So. 2d 675 (Fla.1971); State v. Ashby, 245 So. 2d 225 (Fla.1971); Beverly v. State, 322 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); State v. Vinson, 320 So. 2d 50 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); and Giannetta v. State, 296 So. 2d 654 (Fla.2d DCA 1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. State, 387 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)…Seminole County might allow the prosecution to charge Wright with the commission of two different crimes,3 but it is clear both crimes grew out of the same criminal episode. Richardson v. State, 340 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). State v. Evans, 338 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), cert. denied, 346 So. 2d 1248 (Fla.1977) is not controlling because in Evans, the defendant was charged with committing different acts of arson at different times, against different property and victims. Had Wright been charged…
-
State v. Catalano, 60 So. 3d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…ruling of the Second District.” See Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665, 667 (Fla.1992) (“[I]f the district court of the district in which the trial court is located has decided the issue, the trial court is bound to follow it”) (quoting State v. Hayes, 338 So. 2d 51, 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)). The State of Florida filed this timely petition for certiorari review arguing that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law because section 316.3045 does not invite arbitrary enforcement, it co…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Ashby, 245 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1971)
- Chesebrough v. State, 255 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1971)
- State v. Vinson, 320 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Giannetta v. State, 296 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
- Beverly v. State, 322 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)