EARL NATHANIEL GARRISON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EARL NATHANIEL GARRISON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
338 So. 2d 70
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty of robbery by a jury, adjudged guilty and sentenced. On appeal, he urges that error was committed when the trial judge denied his “Motion to Suppress Lineup, Showup, Photograph, Other Pre-Trial Confrontation, and Courtroom Identification of the Defendant.” A review of the record shows that the identification of the defendant was clear and positive. It meets the test set forth in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 98 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). The judgment and sentence are affirmed. See Glas v. State, 329 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tavares v. Allstate Ins. Co., 342 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…below should consider, but is not limited to, the following authorities in declaring the rights of the parties: Section 627.736(4)(d)4 a, Florida Statutes (Supp.1976); Section 320.02, Florida Statutes (1975); Williams v. Leatherby Insurance Company, 338 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Staley v. Florida Farm Bureau Insurance Co., 328 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Tapscott v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., 330 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Kotich v. Criterion Insurance Company, 38 Fla.Supp. 199 (1st Cir.Ct…
-
Ward v. Fla. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. & Allstate Ins. Co., 375 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…9. It is noted that in the Sherman case (as argued here), the owner had allowed the insurance to lapse because of the inoperable condition of his automobile. The District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Williams v. Leatherby Insurance Company, 338 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976), cert, denied 345 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1977) (decided prior to Sherman), reached a conclusion opposite to that in Sherman, but the Williams’ opinion does not disclose what the [*900] court considered to be the effect, if any, of Secti…
-
Denmark v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 384 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)…PER CURIAM. We affirm, as we did in Johns v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 375 So. 2d 320 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), based on the reasoning in Williams v. Leatherby Insurance Company, 338 So. 2d 70 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 345 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1977). We cannot, as appellant urges, subscribe to the view that in every instance in which a motor vehicle is inoperable, its owner need not maintain security as required by Section 627.733, Flor…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (U.S. 1972)
- Glas v. State, 329 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)