EMPRESA GUATEMALTECA DE AVIACION, A/K/A AVIATECA GUATEMALA AIRWAYS, A GUATEMALAN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

MARSHALL ADER ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Thomson v. State, 398 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
  …3 So. 275 (1937). Intent is an essential element of contempt. Florida Ventilated Awning Co. v. Dickson, 67 So. 2d 218 (Fla.1953); Young v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 46 So. 2d 26 (Fla.1950); Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. State, 338 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Although appellant’s conduct does appear, as a practical matter, to have hindered the trial court in its efforts to dispose of the O’Neal ease as quickly as possible while affording O’Neal sufficient time to prepare his defense,…
• State v. Nourse, 437 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
  …litative Services. State ex rel Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Sepe, 291 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Also see Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Division of Mental Health, South Florida State Hospital v. State, 338 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). We note, however, that the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services did place the juvenile in question in the [*222] facility ordered by the trial court, and a short time thereafter advised the trial court that the juven…
• State v. Schreiber, 561 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …ourt stated that the lower court’s directions to HRS amounted to a usurpation of HRS’s authority/ as a division of the executive department, and was in derogation of the doctrine of separation of powers. In Depart. Of Health & Rehab. Serv. v. State, 338 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), this Court, in an appeal of a criminal contempt order, held that a circuit court is not empowered to direct a hospital to provide any certain method of medical treatment. In our view, the above-cited cases are applicable here,…

Authorities Cited

• Popkin v. Crispen, 213 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)
• Rapport v. Weisberg, 316 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)