DAVID MARK SCHACHTER, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1976-10-19
No. 76-438
Per Curiam
338 So. 2d 269 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Off-duty municipal police officer lacked authority to arrest defendant for traffic violations outside his jurisdiction while acting as private citizen, rendering trial court without jurisdiction.


Holding

An off-duty municipal police officer acting as a private citizen may only arrest for felonies committed in his presence, not traffic infractions, and thus lacked authority to arrest defendant for reckless driving.


Headnotes

[1] An off-duty municipal police officer acting in civilian clothes and driving a private vehicle may exercise arrest authority only for felonies committed in his presence, n…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Magil's actions can only be sustained as the actions of a private citizen who has the right to arrest a person who commits a felony in his presence”

Court explaining that off-duty officer's authority is limited to felony arrests, not traffic violations

Facts & Procedural History

Off-duty North Miami Beach police officer Charles Magil, dressed in civilian clothes and driving his own car, observed defendant making a right turn o…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, David Schachter, by petition for writ of certiorari seeks to review the affirmance by the circuit court (sitting in its appellate capacity) of his conviction for reckless driving. Petitioner contends that the trial court was without jurisdiction to try him because he had been arrested for traffic violations by a municipal police officer outside of his jurisdiction. We find this point has merit.

The arresting officer, Charles Ma-gil, a City of North Miami Beach policeman, was off duty, dressed in civilian clothes and driving his own car when he observed the defendant making a right turn on red without coming to a complete stop at a traffic light. This violation and other violations committed by the defendant during the ensuing chase took place within the North Miami city limits. Magil’s actions can only be sustained as the actions of a private citizen who has the right to arrest a person who commits a felony in his presence (i. e. in this case, a breach of the peace). See Section 316.016(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1975) and State v. Crum, 323 So. 2d 673 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Defendant’s initial traffic infraction in no way constituted a felony1 and the arrest by Magil was invalid as a private citizen. Therefore, the trial court was without jurisdiction to try the defendant.

Certiorari is granted, the order of affirmance is quashed and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss this action against the defendant and to have him adjudicated not guilty.

So ordered.

. City of St. Petersburg v. Calbeck, 114 So. 2d 316 (Fla.2d DCA 1959).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw