T. W., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A juvenile court cannot dictate placement at a specific facility or set a fixed probation term when a child is committed to the Division of Youth Services.
The juvenile court placed a child on probation for three years, requiring successful completion of a program at a specific school. The Division of You…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
The Division of Youth Services appeals an order entered by the circuit court, juvenile division. The order in question states that T. W.:
“. . . [Sjhall be placed on probation for a period of three (3) years with a condition of that probation being that said child shall successfully complete the program at the Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys.”
Appellant attacks the order on three points. We find merit in two points. The third point becomes moot through resolution of the other two points.
First, Section 39.11(4), Florida Statutes, provides that a juvenile court shall discontinue exercising active control over a child that the court has committed to the Division of Youth Services. Therefore, a juvenile court cannot require the Division of Youth Services to place a child at a particular facility as a condition of probation. In the Interest of A.S.W., 327 So. 2d 872 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); In the Interest of J. N., 279 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Accordingly, that portion of the order which required that T.W. “successfully complete the program of the Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys” is hereby vacated. Second, Section 39.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that a child shall be on probation until his 21st birthday unless he is sooner released on the recommendation of the Division of Youth Services or by the court on the motion of an interested party or its own motion. Further, Section 39.-11(4) provides that any commitment to the Division of Youth Services shall be for an indeterminate period of time not to exceed the child’s 21st birthday. Therefore, a juvenile court cannot specify a period of time that a child is to serve on probation. Accordingly, that portion of the order which specified that T.W.’s probation was fixed at “a period of three (3) years” is hereby vacated.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In the Interest of K.A.B. v. Hyson, 483 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)…is crystal clear that it is within the discretion of the agency to decide where to keep a child who is in its custody. The agency is, of course, better equipped to make day-to-day health and welfare decisions which concern the child. T.W. v. State, 338 So. 2d 549 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); F.B. v. State, 319 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); In the Interest of J.N., 279 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). The courts are not given general supervisory power over the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services under the s…
Authorities Cited
- Decker v. State, 279 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)
- A. S. W. v. State, 327 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)