FRANK C. PETRINE AND SEARLE & MORRIS CORAL GABLES INSURANCE INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
D. BLACK & SONS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND GLEN FALLS INSURANCE CO., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1976-11-02
No. 75-1844
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
338 So. 2d 912 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Negligence cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were defendants in an action which charged negligence in the failure to procure insurance for the plaintiff. The plaintiff also sued in the same cause to establish the existence of the insurance. The court found the existence of the insurance but, in the alternative, found that if it should be held by an appellate court that the evidence did not support his finding that the insurance did exist, then the defendant insurance agents would be liable.

The appellants urge on appeal that such an alternative finding is not allowed by the law. No statute or case on point is cited. Appellants’ reliance on Durbin Paper Stock Co. v. Watson-David Insurance Co., 167 So. 2d 34 (Fla.3d DCA 1964) is misplaced inasmuch as in that case the findings were contradictory rather than alternative.

No error having been demonstrated, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Horn, 353 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
    …D STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY provides coverage of $1,000,000.00 for the benefit of the Plaintiff in excess of the $100,000.00 coverage provided by INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANY. Such an alternative holding is proper. Petrine v. D. Black & Sons, Inc., 338 So. 2d 912 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). * * * * * * We will first discuss the contentions presented by appellant American Manufacturers. It argues on appeal that the trial court erred in ordering it to provide coverage from $100,000.00 to $300,000.00 for the benefit o…
  • Meyer v. AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co., 360 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …sought basically the reformation of a contract of insurance to reflect the intent of the parties. We believe that the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the complaint. Art. V, § 5(b), Fla.Const. See generally Petrine v. D. Black & Sons, Inc., 338 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Perez v. State Auto Insurance, 270 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); and Poindexter v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 127 W.Va. 671, 34 S.E. 2d 340 (1945). Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded for…
  • Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. D. Black & Sons, Inc., 347 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
    …ds were not covered. The judgment against Glens Falls is reversed and for a discussion of the effect of the alternative finding of liability for negligence on the part of Searle & Morris, see this court’s opinion in Petrine v. D. Black & Sons, Inc., 338 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Reversed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw