LADELL SPANN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LADELL SPANN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
339 So. 2d 275
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The only meritorious point raised on appeal is whether the testimony by a state’s witness that appellant did not make a statement to the police officer after he was advised of his rights constituted fundamental error. There was no objection to the testimony at trial. On the basis of Clark v. State, 386 So. 2d 468 (Fla.2d D.C.A.1976), we hold that it was not fundamental error. AFFIRMED.
McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Deco Purchasing & Distrib. Co., Inc. v. Panzirer, 450 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…ing April 1, no services were or could be rendered, and Deco is entitled to restitution. There was a complete failure of consideration, and in such instance, restitution of the monies paid is a proper remedy. Southeast First National Bank v. Taines, 339 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Whether the action be referred to as one for restitution or one for “money had and received,” an action may, in general, be maintained whenever one has money in his hands belonging to another which in equity and good conscience,…
-
Int'l AIR Leases, Inc. v. Eight Eighty P'ship, 464 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…la. 4th DCA 1981); Goodell v. K.T. Enterprises, Inc., 394 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Padgett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Santa Rosa County, 378 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Southeast First National Bank of Miami v. Taines, 339 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Rule 1.270 Fla.R.Civ.P.…
-
Vosr Indus., Inc. v. Martin Props., Inc., 919 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…ed this right of redemption by causing cleared funds to be tendered in its name to the Clerk. For the tender to be effective, VOSR was not required to tender a check from its own account or drawn in its own name. Cf. Southeast First Nat’l v. Taines, 339 So. 2d 275, 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (“[P]ayment of an instrument may be made or given by any person including one who is a stranger with the consent of the holder.)” (citing Colonial Press of Miami, Inc. v. Sanders, 264 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)). The record…