FRANK A. SANDS AND KATTIE L. SANDS, APPELLANTS,
v.
ORLANDO MORON AND BANKERS FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1976-11-23
No. 75-1882
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.
339 So. 2d 307 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the appellees failed to meet their burden of proving lack of authorization to file an appearance and answer on behalf of the defendant.


Facts & Procedural History

A law firm filed an appearance and answer for two defendants in a negligence action. The firm later moved to withdraw, claiming the appearance and ans…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an order granting a motion to withdraw an appearance and answer which the law firm of Weinstein & Bavly, P. A. had filed for Orlando Moron and his co-defendant and insurer, Bankers Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, in an action for damages arising out of the alleged negligence of Moron in the operation of his automobile.

The point on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the motion which was supported by an affidavit of one of the lawyers who had filed the appearance and answer for both defendants. The affidavit sets forth that the appearance and answer were entered by the law firm without authorization.

It is appellant’s contention that appellees have failed to establish that they were, in fact, not authorized to represent defendant, Orlando Moron. We find merit in appellant’s contention and reverse.

The appellees, as moving parties had the burden of proving the facts alleged in its motion to withdraw and that defense counsel were not authorized by Orlando Moron to answer on his behalf. The evidence adduced was insufficient to support the motion. Therefore, the order appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw