MARVIN REYNOLDS, APPELLANT,
v.
ALGER-SULLIVAN LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
MARVIN REYNOLDS, APPELLANT,
ALGER-SULLIVAN LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
76 So. 2d 137
Florida Supreme Court (1954)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The central issue submitted to, and resolved by, the jury in this case, upon conflicting evidence, .was the location of a government section corner. The record provided no basis for a charge pertaining to a “boundary by acquiescence” and the trial court therefore did not err in refusing the charge taken from Shaw v. Williams, Fla., 50 So. 2d. 125, which had no application to the case at bar. The ruling on the charge actually given was not assigned. as error. See City of Coral Gables v. State ex rel. Hassenteufel, Fla., 38 So. 2d 467.
Affirmed.
ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW and BARNS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Buchanan v. State of Fla. & Nathan Mayo, 111 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)…y sentence. . In his petition for writ of habeas corpus the appellant contended that the sentence imposed in the judgment of the Circuit Court for Marion County was invalid under the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Copeland v. State, Fla., 76 So. 2d 137; that Sections 801.02 and 801.03, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., under which the sentence was imposed, was unconstitutional; that the act charged in the third count was a mere continuation of the act charged in the first count, of which the appellant was…1 / 4
-
McKEE v. State, 203 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1967)…blish at length those criminal statutes that it amends by increasing the maximum sentences as required by the constitution of the State of Florida, Section 16, Article 3 * * * ” Appellant relies heavily upon our decision in Copeland v. State, Fla., 76 So. 2d 137, in which we held that “ * * * as applied to rape and the penalty therefor, Chapter 281S8, Laws of Florida 1953 [Ch. 801, F.S.] violates Section 16, Article III of the State Constitution, and is void and of no effect.” (at 142) Our opinion in Cope…
-
Mott v. Cochran, 117 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1960)…e State ex rel. Shargaa v. Culver, Fla., 113 So. 2d 383, the matter of the constitutionality of the statute involved is not presented to us for consideration here. The State, through the Attorney General, could have done so. Copeland v. State, Fla., 76 So. 2d 137. The petitioner Mott apparently, for obvious reasons, has not done so. It would be to his disadvantage so to do. If the 1959 statute were declared unenforceable, then we would return to the former statutory penalty for forgery which was a maximum of…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Shaw v. Williams, 50 So.2d 125 (Fla. 1950)
- City of Coral Gables v. State, 38 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1948)