WILLIE MAE PRIEST, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY PRIEST LOGAN AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF WILLIAM J. PRIEST, DECEASED, APPELLEE
WILLIE MAE PRIEST, APPELLANT,
MARY PRIEST LOGAN AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF WILLIAM J. PRIEST, DECEASED, APPELLEE
76 So. 2d 883
Florida Supreme Court (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The summary declaratory judgment, from which this appeal was taken, which expressly provides that: “The Court retains jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this cause in order to entertain such further proceedings herein as may be proper”, is hereby affirmed. We deem it appropriate to observe that we construe this retention of jurisdiction proviso to mean that the learned Circuit Judge sitting as Chancellor will consider any and all equitable claims which appellant may appropriately present to him.
Affirmed.
ROBERTS, C. J.j and TERRELL, THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hodges v. Logan, 82 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 1955)…THORNAL, Justice. This case was before the Court on a prior appeal. See Priest v. Logan, Fla. 19SS, 76 So. 2d 883. The first appeal was brought here by Willie Mae Priest then living who was defendant in a declaratory judgment proceeding brought by Mary Priest Logan, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of William J. Priest, deceased. In that case Mrs. L…