WORKMAN ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
RECREATIONAL ELECTRONICS, INC., APPELLEE
WORKMAN ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLANT,
RECREATIONAL ELECTRONICS, INC., APPELLEE
339 So. 2d 707
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In support of its counterclaim, appellee introduced several invoices for goods which it had shipped to appellant. For convenience, appellee’s vice president, through whom these invoices had been introduced, was asked to give their total. He testified that the invoices totalled $7,212.00, and judgment for the appellee was entered in that amount. Actually, the figure given by this witness was in error, because the invoices total $6,959.75. Accordingly, the judgment must be reduced to that amount.
Otherwise, the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vaughan v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 435 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…uld properly be within the province of the trial court to consider upon the entry of a judgment in behalf of appellant, which has yet to be accomplished, and we decline to address these issues for the first time on this appeal. See, Morton v. Rafai, 339 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); City of Coral Gables v. Puiggros, 376 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979); Allender v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association, 389 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Furthermore, [*892] since the application for attorney’s fees is a…
-
Allender v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n OF Titusville, 389 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)…l court and matters raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered. E. g., Hartley v. Florida E. Coast Ry. Co., 339 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 1976); Jaruagua Enterprises, Inc. v. Dom, Inc., 339 So. 2d 702 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); J. E. Morton v. Rifai, 339 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). . See generally Robinson v. Springfield Co., 21 Fla. 203 (1885); 13 Fla.Jur.2d Creditor’s Rights §§ 280, 287 (1979). . See First State Bank v. Fitch, 105 Fla. 435, 141 So. 299 (1932); Clafin v. Ambrose, 37 Fla. 78, 19 So. 628…
-
Hollie Lee McDONALD v. Allstate Ins. Co., 408 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…tends that such a reservation negates an accord and satisfaction by precluding a meeting of the minds or an agreement between the parties. A meeting of the minds or an agreement is an essential element of an accord and satisfaction. Morton v. Rifai, 339 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); State Road Department v. Houdaille Industries, Inc., 237 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). We see no reason to disallow an accord and satisfaction merely because the parties agreed that two specific portions of the claim would be…