LENORA JACKSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1976-10-07
No. 49123
OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.
340 So. 2d 470 Florida Supreme Court (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 24 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We entered our order allowing certiorari and dispensing with oral argument in this case because of conflict between the decision rendered by the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 328 So. 2d 457, and Edwards v. State, 223 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). We have reviewed the arguments of counsel as presented in their briefs submitted to this Court.

The conflict of decision between the instant case and Edwards, supra, having been resolved in King v. State, Fla., 339 So. 2d 172, opinion filed this day, the writ of certiorari issued herein is discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (24 total)

  • Thomas v. State, 748 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1999)
    …andate of the Declaration of Rights of the Constitution of the State of Florida. See Webb v. State, 519 So. 2d 748, 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). While we recognize that trial judges have broad discretion in the conduct of trials, see Galbut v. Garfinkl, 340 So. 2d 470, 473 (Fla.1976), the totality of the circumstances surrounding the jury’s deliberations here appears to have rendered the jury’s verdict unreliable. Accordingly, because we cannot conclude that the extreme circumstances prevailing here did not impro…
  • Brandt v. Brandt, 525 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
    …o. 2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Pruitt [*1019] v. Pruitt, 370 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Property rights not adjudicated on dissolution can be determined at a later time if jurisdiction to do so has been specifically retained, Galbut v. Garfinkl, 340 So. 2d 470 (Fla.1976). The court also retains jurisdiction to enforce any executory provisions contained in a final judgment of dissolution. Hoskin v. Hoskin, 349 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Sapp v. Sapp, 275 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); cf. Mason v. Mason…
    1 / 2
  • Behar v. Se. Banks Tr. Co., 374 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …been corrected at the hearing scheduled for November, 1978, wherein the court was to determine property rights, special equities (if any), alimony, support, etc., and the court was perfectly justified in bifurcating these issues. Galbut v. Garfinkl, 340 So. 2d 470 (Fla.1976). We also fail to find wherein the court, by subsequent orders, was interfering with this court’s jurisdiction of the appeal of the final judgment of dissolution. See: Kalmutz v. Kalmutz, 299 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Fla.R.App.P. 9.6…

Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw