NORMAN K. SCHWARZ, APPELLANT,

v.

ROY I. SPOUTZ ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• MacKENZIE v. AVIS Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 369 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …s’ failure to provide UM coverage was in breach of its rental agreement. There is no question that, under the circumstances, Avis had no statutory obligation to provide Dr. MacKenzie with UM protection. E. g., Guardado v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 340 So. 2d 510 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). The sole issue then is whether the defendant agreed to provide more than what was required by law by specifically contracting to furnish coverage in accordance with “the standard provisions of an automobile liability . . . policy.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• The Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Roth, 388 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …and the plaintiff, when operating the subject vehicle, did not have uninsured vehicle coverage. Kohly v. Royal Indemnity Co., 190 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied 200 So. 2d 813 (Fla.1967). Accord, Guardado v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 340 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Morpurgo v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, 339 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).1 The only instance which we have uncovered in which the question of a named insured’s authority to reject U/M coverage for another named insured was in the ca…
• Lipof v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 558 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …Financial Responsibility Law is not required to offer uninsured motorist coverage and can waive such coverage against a lessee.. Mac-Kenzie v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc., 369 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Guardado v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 340 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Morpurgo v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 339 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Several other courts have dealt with employer self-insurers as it applies to uninsured motorist coverage under statutes similar to Florida’s. In those c…

Authorities Cited

• City OF Miami Springs v. Carr, 319 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)