STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
FANNY NAPOLI AND EDWARD NAPOLI, APPELLEES
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE, ETC., APPELLANT,
FANNY NAPOLI AND EDWARD NAPOLI, APPELLEES
340 So. 2d 935
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 332 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. White, 330 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), and Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Farmer, 330 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
ALDERMAN, J. and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., and BERANEK, John R., Associate Judges, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Dorsett v. Granvill Dorsett, 902 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…urt for the purpose of “entering a final judgment awarding the wife exclusive occupancy of the marital domicile until the youngest of the two children in her custody attains majority or otherwise becomes emancipated”); see also Robinson v. Robinson, 340 So. 2d 935, 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)(“The trial court granted to appellee-wife the possession and occupancy of the marital home until the youngest child of the parties is eighteen years of age. Such an award is proper because it is in the nature of maintenance…
-
Zeller v. Zeller, 396 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…d principle of the law of divorce. These awards are proper because they are in the nature of maintenance and support. Alford v. Alford, 364 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 2nd. DCA 1978); Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Robinson v. Robinson, 340 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). The husband is a medical doctor specializing in pathology and earns in excess of $85,000 per year. The wife is a certified teacher currently receiving approximately $21,000 per year in combined alimony and child support, but she…
-
Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. Beekman, 174 So. 3d 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…uction of evidence on that issue.” Scariti v. Sabillon, 16 So. 3d 144, 145-46 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (quoting LRX, Inc. v. Horizon Assocs. Joint Venture ex rel. Horizon-ANF, Inc., 842 So. 2d 881, 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)); see also Robinson v. Robinson, 340 So. 2d 935, 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) (stating an issue was tried by consent where, “without objection from either party the issue was presented, considered and ruled on by the trial court”). The Second District held that the key test of determining “whether an…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 332 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
- Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Farmer, 330 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Newton F. White, 330 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)