H. R. WILLIAMS
v.
NATHAN MCCLELLAN
H. R. WILLIAMS
NATHAN MCCLELLAN
155 Fla. 625
Florida Supreme Court (1945)
Caution
Also reported at: 21 So. 2d 212
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of the record and briefs, the decree appealed from is affirmed.
It is so ordered.
CHAPMAN, C. J„ BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Est. of Elizabeth D. Mesker v. Fla. Bank & Tr. Co. AT W. Palm Beach, 158 Fla. 180 (Fla. 1946)
-
Moore v. Fitzgerald, 157 Fla. 395 (Fla. 1946)
-
ST. Gaudens v. Parry, 516 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)…ides. The statute is clear and the cases relied on by appellee for a different result are either inapposite or distinguishable. The statute is to be strictly construed. Wade v. Janney, 151 Fla. 260, 9 So. 2d 715 (1942); In re Raughley, 155 Fla. 723, 21 So. 2d 212 (1945). Our disposition of this issue renders the additional points raised by appellant moot. We reverse the order appealed and remand for appropriate disposition of other pending matters. REVERSED AND REMANDED. GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.…