MYRON L. RADLIN, APPELLANT,
v.
AERO SYSTEMS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appellant had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to establish personal jurisdiction.
The appellant was involved in corporate stock exchange agreements in Florida, visited the area for business, and executed modification contracts, all …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substituted Service Of Process cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person. The sole question is whether or not the appellant had sufficient minimum contact to entitle the appellee (plaintiff) to perfect substituted service of process, pursuant to § 48.181, Fla.Stat. The appellant has provided this court with a copy of the sworn complaint, the exchange agreement, plan of reorganization, and release and acknowledgement of warranty payable. These documents, along with the order appealed, constitute the entire record on appeal. The court was not provided with a copy of the motion to dismiss. The complaint and documents related to a corporate stock exchange. The appellant was a party to these contracts in Florida, visited the area relative to the business of the corporations, executed subsequent modification contracts. These were all for his pecuniary benefit.
Therefore, it would appear that the order under review should be affirmed on the authority of McCarthy v. Little River Bank and Trust Company, 224 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1969); DeVaney v. Rumsch, 228 So. 2d 904 (Fla.1969); 4th Dimension Interiors, Inc. v. Decorator Services, Ltd., 256 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1972); Elmex Corporation v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Association of Fort Lauderdale, 325 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1976).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Trans Pac. Indus., Inc. v. Trans Pac. Indus., Inc., 444 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…Co., Inc., 519 F.Supp. 1162 (S.D.Fla.1981); Engineered Storage Systems, Inc. v. National Partitions & Interiors, Inc., 415 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); A.B.L. Realty Corp. v. Cohl, 384 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Radlin v. Aero Systems, Inc., 340 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Atwood v. Calumet Industries, Inc., 308 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); sections 48.181, 48.193(1), Florida Statutes (1981).…
Authorities Cited
- The Elmex Corp. v. Atl. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n OF Fort Lauderdale, 325 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
- DeVANEY v. Bernard J. Rumsch, M.D., 228 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1969)
- McCARTHY v. Little River Bank & Tr. Co., 224 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- 4TH Dimension Interiors, Inc. v. Decorator Servs. Ltd., 256 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)