WALTER C. KUHNS, CHARLES H. VIRGIL AND HIS WIFE, MARTHA E. VIRGIL, APPELLANTS,

v.

DOROTHY MILLER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Exterminators, Inc. v. Truly Nolen, Inc., 86 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1956)
  …ve year term commencing August 9, 1950. The effect of the contempt order was to extend the effective period of the contract into 1956. In our view the chancellor was devoid of power to do this, even as punishment for contempt. Giehler v. Ward, Fla., 77 So. 2d 452. We do think the trial court has power to punish for contempt by imposing a compensatory finé on the contemnor. The amount of such a fine may be measured by the damages, if any, suffered by the party in whose favor the injunction is granted. It is…
• Dillard Homes, Inc. v. Most Reverend Coleman F. Carroll, 152 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
  …., Inc., 238 App.Div. 520, 264 N.Y.S. 678 (1933); Dukas v. Tolmach, 142 N.Y.S.2d 176 (Sup.Ct.1955); Deborah Homes, Inc. v. Firestone, 135 N.Y.S.2d 289 (Sup.Ct.1954); Middleton v. Moore, 289 S.W. 1045 (Tex.Civ.App.1926). . Giehler v. Ward, Fla.1955, 77 So. 2d 452.…
• City OF Orlando v. W. Orange Country Club, Inc., 9 So. 3d 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
  …les of the law of specific performance is that the court will not make a new or different contract for the parties ... [and] will compel the performance of a contract only in the precise terms agreed upon by the parties themselves.” Giehler v. Ward, 77 So. 2d 452, 453 (Fla.1955). It would violate this principle to order Defendants to supply reclaimed water at no charge for the term of the agreement, but in quantities materially different than that required by the agreement. Third, we are not convinced that…

Authorities Cited

• Beatty v. Flannery, 49 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1950)
• Haas et ux. v. Crisp Realty Co., 65 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 1953)