ERNEST NOFAL, APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER PIPER AND ANGELA PIPER, CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AND DONALD R. FOX, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Benn v. Key West Propane Gas Corp., Fla., 72 So. 2d 910, and the authorities there cited.
ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON and DREW, JJ., concur.
Order on Petition for Rehearing Granted.
The petition for rehearing in this cause sets forth that this Court did not have the benefit of certain original exhibits of the appellant at the time the decision in this case was rendered. These exhibits were ordered sent to the Court but were not in the record at the time the opinion of the Court was rendered.
The exhibits have now been forwarded to this Court by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Dade County and have been examined by this Court. We find nothing in the exhibits which alters our view that there was no error in the decree appealed from. It is thereupon ordered that the Per Curi-am opinion filed December 7, 1954, affirming the judgment of the lower court on the authority of Benn v. Key West Propane Gas Corp., Fla., 72 So. 2d 910, and the authorities there cited, be and the same is hereby adhered to.
MATHEWS, C. J., HOBSON, ROBERTS concur. and THOMAS, and DREW, JJ.,
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Schoen v. Gilbert, 436 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 1983)…reasonably to expect that the route ahead was free of the particular physical impediment which caused her injury. It was for the jury to determine, whether under the circumstances, the dangerous condition required a warning. See Brant v. Van Zandt, 77 So. 2d 858 (Fla.1954). The critical question to be determined in this case is whether the lighting condition was such that a reasonable and prudent person would ordinarily have given a warning. Defendant says it was a bright and sunny day; the plaintiff said…
-
Bergen v. Wyett Shultz, 79 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 1955)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Co., Inc., 151 Fla. 247, 9 So. 2d 366; Earley v. Morrison Cafeteria Co. of Orlando, Fla., 61 So. 2d 477; Brant v. Van Zandt, Fla., 1955, 77 So. 2d 858. MATHEWS, C. J., ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., and PARKS, Associate Justice, concur.…
-
Chambers v. Southern Wholesale, 92 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 1956)…ess a normal adult person is charged with the duty to exercise a reasonable degree of care for his own safety and to see that which would be obvious upon the ordinary use of his senses, Hoag v. Moeller, Fla., 82 So. 2d 138; Brant v. Van Zandt, Fla., 77 So. 2d 858; Frederich’s Market, Inc., v. Knox, Fla., 66 So. 2d 251; Bowles v. Elkes Pontiac Co., Fla., 63 So. 2d 769; Earley v. Morrison, Fla., 61 So. 2d 477; Clyde Bar, Inc., v. McClamma, 152 Fla. 118, 10 So. 2d 916; Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Co., 151 Fla. 24…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Benn v. KEY W. Propane GAS Corp., 72 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1954)