ZOTO'S INTERNATIONAL, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
RUTH PINKUS AND JOLAN'S BEAUTY SALON, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
ZOTO'S INTERNATIONAL, INC., APPELLANT,
RUTH PINKUS AND JOLAN'S BEAUTY SALON, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
341 So. 2d 811
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977)
Caution
Cited by 21 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Green v. Hood, 120 So. 2d 223 (Fla.2d DCA 1960); Shurden v. Thomas, 134 So. 2d 876 (Fla.1st DCA 1961) and Farish v. Lum’s, Inc., 267 So. 2d 325 (Fla.1972); Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. Bell, 318 So. 2d 212 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Scherer v. The Club, Inc., 328 So. 2d 532 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
Denis Rety v. Green, 546 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…Green’s extensive net worth further supports our conclusion that the trial judge clearly abused his discretion in reducing the punitive damages against Green to a mere $50,000 based on "economic castigation” grounds. . Unlike Mendehon v. Mendeison, 341 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), relied on by the defendants, we are modifying on appeal the remit-titur ordered by the trial court so as to increase the amount of remitted damages. This being so, we think, fairness and common sense dictate that the plaintiff be…
-
Frazier v. State, 467 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…permission to do so."): Jones v. Knuck, 388 So. 2d 328, 329 (Fla.3d DCA 1980) ("Compliance with [an appellate] mandate is a purely ministerial act and the trial court may not depart from [the] mandate without ... consent.”); Mendelson v. Mendelson, 341 So. 2d 811, 813-14 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) (“No principle of appellate jurisdiction is more firmly established than the one which provides that a trial court utterly lacks the power to deviate from the terms of an appellate mandate.”); City of Miami Beach v. Arthre…
-
Savage v. MacY'S E., Inc., 719 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…impose a condition on the result required by our decision contrary to one of the most basic principles of appellate review, that the lower tribunal “utterly lacks the power to deviate from the terms of an appellate mandate.” Mendelson v. Mendelson, 341 So. 2d 811, 814 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). See generally O.P. Corp. v. Village of North Palm Beach, 302 So. 2d 130 (Fla.1974); Berger v. Leposky, 103 So. 2d 628 (Fla.1958). It is not insignificant that this case was presented to us as one which involved only the subs…
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Farish v. Lum's, Inc., 267 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1972)
- Green v. Hood, 120 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
- Shurden v. Thomas, 134 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)
- Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. Bell, 318 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Scherer v. The Club, Inc., 328 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)